By Frans H. van Eemeren, A. Francisca Sn Henkemans
This ebook concentrates on argumentation because it emerges in usual discourse, even if the discourse is institutionalized or strictly casual. the most important suggestions from the idea of argumentation are systematically mentioned and defined with the aid of examples from real-life discourse and texts. the fundamental ideas are defined which are instrumental within the research and evaluate of argumentative discourse. Methodical tools are provided for selecting alterations of opinion, reading and comparing argumentation and featuring arguments in oral and written discourse. additionally, the publication presents a superb number of routines and assignments to enhance the scholars' ability in offering argumentation. The authors start their therapy of argumentation idea on the similar juncture the place argumentation additionally starts off in perform: the variation of opinion that events the evolvement of the argumentation. every one bankruptcy starts with a brief precis of the necessities and ends with a few routines that scholars can use to grasp the fabric. Argumentation is the 1st introductory textbook of this type. it truly is meant as a normal advent for college kids who're attracted to a formal behavior of argumentative discourse. feedback for additional interpreting are made for every subject and several other additional assignments are extra to the workouts. specified good points: * A concise and entire remedy of either the theoretical backgrounds and the perform of argumentation research and review. * an important techniques from pragmatics (speech act idea, Grice's cooperative precept) offered in a non-technical means; introducing the idea of verbal verbal exchange. * detailed insurance of either oral and written presentation of arguments. * workouts and assignments in response to real-life texts from quite a few contexts.
Read or Download Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation PDF
Similar logic & language books
This edited quantity provides a entire heritage of contemporary common sense from the center a while in the course of the finish of the 20 th century. as well as a background of symbolic common sense, the members additionally research advancements within the philosophy of good judgment and philosophical good judgment nowa days. The e-book starts with chapters on overdue medieval advancements and common sense and philosophy of good judgment from Humanism to Kant.
The Liar paradox increases foundational questions on common sense, language, and fact (and semantic notions in general). an easy Liar sentence like 'This sentence is fake' seems to be either actual and fake whether it is both precise or fake. For if the sentence is right, then what it says is the case; yet what it says is that it really is fake, for this reason it has to be fake.
- Computability and Logic
- Hegel's Theory of the Subject
- Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense
- Modal Logic with Descriptions
- Rethinking Epistemology
- The Rape of Lucretia and the Founding of Republics: Readings in Livy, Machiavelli, and Rousseau
Extra resources for Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation
Has the main dispute in this discussion been resolved or merely settled? A Chairman: If everyone is present then I would like to wel- 34 CHAPTER 2 come everyone to the meeting. I believe the problem is clear. We have a shortage of personnel and new workers cannot be found. We have received an offer from an organization for job placement of discharged prisoners that would make ex-prisoners available to us as employees. Mrs. Foster is present as an expert to tell us more about this. I would then like to open up the matter for discussion.
Tindale, Acts of Arguing, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1999, chapter 5; and F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser, “Rhetorical analysis within a pragma-dialectical framework: The case of R. J. Reynolds,” Argumentation, 2000, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 293–305. An overview of the state of the art in the development of interpretation and reconstruction methods is provided by M. A. van Rees, “Argument interpretation and reconstruction,” in F. H. ), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2001, chapter 7.
C. Can anyone explain why Douglas Hurd has been chosen to chair the Booker Prize judges? His own novels—mediocre political thrillers—have never been shortlisted for the Betty Trask Award, let alone for the Booker. And on the one occasion in his political career when he could have championed the cause of literature, he preferred to equivocate: As Home Secretary at the time of the fatwa he refused to meet Salman Rushdie, expressing a lofty disdain for both the novelist and the Ayatollahs. Of all his unpleasant duties at the Home Office, he once said, by far the worst had been reading The Satanic Verses.